Markup /qa/72

Comment
>>69
Probably a duplicated input name issue, expanding thumbnails is done by wrapping them with a label with checkbox inside and showing or hiding the original image with CSS depending on whether the hidden checkbox is clicked or not. This is nice because it doesn't use JS at all, but maybe it's confusing for a browser which remembers the first checkbox as checked. Will take a look at it tomorrow. 
>>71
I LOVE this. finally someone showing EXACTLY what's wrong.
But in this case this is expected. Inline attachments are treated differently than regular attachments, they are directly embedded in post html. For catalog, and that home page part is actually a fragment of catalog, the thread link is just the first attachment wrapped in a link, while below the attachment is the post's content. To make the inline images non-expandable there I would have to rewrite the post's HTML on the fly, this is not going to happen for performance reasons.