User: too2q
About
SNCA connoisseur
Summary
- Joined:
- Last visit:
- Last active:
- Posts: 75
- Threads: 2
Recent posts
>>76
on the zarty, right now it's 1431, it handles the traffic fine with 6% cpu usage
on the zarty, right now it's 1431, it handles the traffic fine with 6% cpu usage
File: 1785865662311.png (6.61 KB, 325x90, Screenshot 2026-08-01 at 21-15-47 Home.png)
>>69
Probably a duplicated input name issue, expanding thumbnails is done by wrapping them with a label with checkbox inside and showing or hiding the original image with CSS depending on whether the hidden checkbox is clicked or not. This is nice because it doesn't use JS at all, but maybe it's confusing for a browser which remembers the first checkbox as checked. Will take a look at it tomorrow.
>>71
I LOVE this. finally someone showing EXACTLY what's wrong.
But in this case this is expected. Inline attachments are treated differently than regular attachments, they are directly embedded in post html. For catalog, and that home page part is actually a fragment of catalog, the thread link is just the first attachment wrapped in a link, while below the attachment is the post's content. To make the inline images non-expandable there I would have to rewrite the post's HTML on the fly, this is not going to happen for performance reasons.
Probably a duplicated input name issue, expanding thumbnails is done by wrapping them with a label with checkbox inside and showing or hiding the original image with CSS depending on whether the hidden checkbox is clicked or not. This is nice because it doesn't use JS at all, but maybe it's confusing for a browser which remembers the first checkbox as checked. Will take a look at it tomorrow.
>>71
I LOVE this. finally someone showing EXACTLY what's wrong.
But in this case this is expected. Inline attachments are treated differently than regular attachments, they are directly embedded in post html. For catalog, and that home page part is actually a fragment of catalog, the thread link is just the first attachment wrapped in a link, while below the attachment is the post's content. To make the inline images non-expandable there I would have to rewrite the post's HTML on the fly, this is not going to happen for performance reasons.
>>142
true, I'm just wondering what's so special about that particular topic that it took so many victims
true, I'm just wondering what's so special about that particular topic that it took so many victims
>I've long had the idea of creating a full-fledged comic book story based on Ongezellig
there are like millions of people that burned themselves out trying to do this exact same thing
there are like millions of people that burned themselves out trying to do this exact same thing
>>55
drag-and-drop works fine, copy-and-paste is limited to a single file on firefox and should work fine on chrome, I don't know about other limitations (yet)
drag-and-drop works fine, copy-and-paste is limited to a single file on firefox and should work fine on chrome, I don't know about other limitations (yet)
yes, nothing unconventional in this regard
>>136
864052 - clipboardData only supports pasting one file
We will have to live with it for some time.
864052 - clipboardData only supports pasting one file
We will have to live with it for some time.
>>132
I don't know, do you use Firefox? There is a bug in Firefox that allows to copy only a single file at a time, but then only that file is added to the form. And on Chrome it seems to be working fine.
I don't know, do you use Firefox? There is a bug in Firefox that allows to copy only a single file at a time, but then only that file is added to the form. And on Chrome it seems to be working fine.
>>128
They were not uploaded. If they were uploaded, but not referenced, they would be visible at the top. Next time check if they are visible in the files box. There is a chance for a bug although I haven't seen anything like that yet.
They were not uploaded. If they were uploaded, but not referenced, they would be visible at the top. Next time check if they are visible in the files box. There is a chance for a bug although I haven't seen anything like that yet.
>>125
I always used the post number link to enter a thread, don't remember ever using the [Reply] link. But I would rather name it View thread, because that's what actually does, and will be used to view the entire thread instead of only the last page. Threads are paginated, 50 posts per page, but full view thread is also available, and you have to deliberately click the Last page button or some particular page to enter the paginated view, clicking on a post number redirects to the full view like it does in Vichan.
>Since when was that button? I don't remember seeing it
Since always but it shows only when a thread has more posts that are show in the preview.
I always used the post number link to enter a thread, don't remember ever using the [Reply] link. But I would rather name it View thread, because that's what actually does, and will be used to view the entire thread instead of only the last page. Threads are paginated, 50 posts per page, but full view thread is also available, and you have to deliberately click the Last page button or some particular page to enter the paginated view, clicking on a post number redirects to the full view like it does in Vichan.
>Since when was that button? I don't remember seeing it
Since always but it shows only when a thread has more posts that are show in the preview.
>>42
It is artificial, but everything else in my life is also artificial, I don't live in a cave.
>soruum is... over....
not over, just paused out ofspite boredom
>also why java?
I know the language, I know the ecosystem, it's the highest performance option without going into C++/Rust stuff, it just works. But I haven't written a single line yet, not really interested in doing anything about coding or imageboards atp.
>cool, how much per week?
Twice per week, but currently doing mostly corrective stuff like face pulls, scapular pushups, etc., will see if this can unfuck me at least a little bit
It is artificial, but everything else in my life is also artificial, I don't live in a cave.
>soruum is... over....
not over, just paused out of
>also why java?
I know the language, I know the ecosystem, it's the highest performance option without going into C++/Rust stuff, it just works. But I haven't written a single line yet, not really interested in doing anything about coding or imageboards atp.
>cool, how much per week?
Twice per week, but currently doing mostly corrective stuff like face pulls, scapular pushups, etc., will see if this can unfuck me at least a little bit
>>39
Update: bought 10kg more, doing 40 reps of squats with 14.5 kg in a series is brutal and it's still more of a heart training than leg training
Update: bought 10kg more, doing 40 reps of squats with 14.5 kg in a series is brutal and it's still more of a heart training than leg training
>>38
You got to slowburn it, but the new one is adjustable, I can simply add more weight if that's required.
You got to slowburn it, but the new one is adjustable, I can simply add more weight if that's required.
>>35
Very much offline, I've been training somewhat, bought a new 10 kg (actually 9.5 kg) dumbbell because I maxed out the previous 5 kg one, also a lot of work around house and inside
In the meantime I also grew completely frustrated with the Scala compiler and its terrible slowness, will try to write something in pure Java for a new challenge, maybe a booru because Shimmie is terribly slow
Very much offline, I've been training somewhat, bought a new 10 kg (actually 9.5 kg) dumbbell because I maxed out the previous 5 kg one, also a lot of work around house and inside
In the meantime I also grew completely frustrated with the Scala compiler and its terrible slowness, will try to write something in pure Java for a new challenge, maybe a booru because Shimmie is terribly slow
>enabling ids on a board with accounts
I don't even have a gigachad that could quote you properly
I don't even have a gigachad that could quote you properly
spoiler
||spoiler||>>52
I will improve the formatting to ignore
I will improve the formatting to ignore
<code> elements and then escaping with backticks will work, can also expand the guide to explain how to make tables, references to sources etc., but will need a permission to edit pages for that.the last 4 can't be escaped with backticks because they aren't a part of markdown syntax