Off-topic
Talk about anything.
Before posting, make sure to read the Rules (bottom of the screen)
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 13 | Views: 199 | Currently viewing: 1
Test
End of test
Is the maximum numbers of files 4?
I wonder
yes, nothing unconventional in this regard
>>51
To check if the 4 images would be sent without problems if I selected them all in one go instead of opening the file selector each time for each image. It worked fine so I don't have to worry about images not being posted because I didn't select them at the same time
>>55
drag-and-drop works fine, copy-and-paste is limited to a single file on firefox and should work fine on chrome, I don't know about other limitations (yet)
drag-and-drop works fine, copy-and-paste is limited to a single file on firefox and should work fine on chrome, I don't know about other limitations (yet)
>>48
btw i can increase the max number, but I dont think its necessary for now.
btw i can increase the max number, but I dont think its necessary for now.
File: 1785446430085.png (36.71 KB, 500x250, 1783991384662.png)
When I open one image on the overboard (let's say the first image of the first thread that is on the top at the time) and if I bump another thread, the newly bumped thread whill have the first image attached on its op expanded. I wonder if this is intentional or not, or if it's another mobile bugfox issue
I've also noticed that, sometimes on the home page, at the recent images section, images may be shown on their full size instead of redirecting you to the thread they're nested on, and it's usually images that you have expanded before. It's weird
File: 1785447251447.mp4 (14.59 MB, 720x1600, Screenrecorder-2026-07-30-16-32-03-443.mp4)
Video record of this strange issue I just noticed. Why this thread?
>>69
Probably a duplicated input name issue, expanding thumbnails is done by wrapping them with a label with checkbox inside and showing or hiding the original image with CSS depending on whether the hidden checkbox is clicked or not. This is nice because it doesn't use JS at all, but maybe it's confusing for a browser which remembers the first checkbox as checked. Will take a look at it tomorrow.
>>71
I LOVE this. finally someone showing EXACTLY what's wrong.
But in this case this is expected. Inline attachments are treated differently than regular attachments, they are directly embedded in post html. For catalog, and that home page part is actually a fragment of catalog, the thread link is just the first attachment wrapped in a link, while below the attachment is the post's content. To make the inline images non-expandable there I would have to rewrite the post's HTML on the fly, this is not going to happen for performance reasons.
Probably a duplicated input name issue, expanding thumbnails is done by wrapping them with a label with checkbox inside and showing or hiding the original image with CSS depending on whether the hidden checkbox is clicked or not. This is nice because it doesn't use JS at all, but maybe it's confusing for a browser which remembers the first checkbox as checked. Will take a look at it tomorrow.
>>71
I LOVE this. finally someone showing EXACTLY what's wrong.
But in this case this is expected. Inline attachments are treated differently than regular attachments, they are directly embedded in post html. For catalog, and that home page part is actually a fragment of catalog, the thread link is just the first attachment wrapped in a link, while below the attachment is the post's content. To make the inline images non-expandable there I would have to rewrite the post's HTML on the fly, this is not going to happen for performance reasons.
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 13 | Views: 199 | Currently viewing: 1